"The closest that the mind can come to
representing who we are is the thought ‘I’ am'. But that thought is not who we
really are. Whether that thought is there or not, we still exist. We know the
thought 'I am'. That thought is the start of the false sense of an individual,
a separate ‘I’. Because we didn't know any better, the mind attached other
labels to this ‘I’ thought, such as 'I am good,' 'I am bad,' 'I have this
problem,' and so on. But those thoughts don't have anything to do with us,
because the very ‘I’ thought itself, the sense of separation, is not actually
who we are. Once you see the falseness of the ‘I’ thought, that what we are is
not an individual person at all, the identifications and ideas of a lifetime
all collapse because they are all based on a false premise.
There is no practice to overcome suffering.
It is simply a matter of seeing that the false ‘I’ is an assumption, that the
whole mechanism is a conceptual house of cards. Then a lifetime of suffering evaporates. As Bob (Adamson) says,
without the cause (the ‘I’), can there be any effects (psychological suffering
and bondage)?
John Wheeler, "Awakening to the Natural state"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous comments not allowed - too much spam!